<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Artículos</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/2238/11311</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T14:03:10Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Low back pain among office workers in three Spanish-speaking countries: Findings from the CUPID study</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/2238/9958</link>
<description>Low back pain among office workers in three Spanish-speaking countries: Findings from the CUPID study
Campos-Fumero, Adriana; Delclos, George; Douphrate, David; Felknor, Sarah; Vargas-Prada, Sergio; Serra, Consol; Coggon, David; Ruiz- De Porras, David Gimeno
Objectives—To assess differences in the prevalence and incidence of low back pain (LBP) and associated disability among office workers in Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Spain.&#13;
Methods—Data were collected at baseline (n=947, 93% response) in November 2007 and at follow-up after 12 months (n=853, 90% response). Six outcome measures were examined: baseline prevalence of (1) LBP in past 12 months, (2) LBP in past month, and (3) disabling LBP in past month; and at follow-up: (4) incidence of new LBP in the past month, (5) new disabling LBP, and (6) persistent LBP. Differences in prevalence by country were characterized by odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs), before and after adjustment for covariates.&#13;
Results—Prevalence of LBP in the past month among office employees in Costa Rica (46.0%) and Nicaragua (44.2%) was higher than in Spain (33.6%). Incidence of new LBP was 37.0% in Nicaragua (OR=2.49; 95% CI: 1.57-3.95), 14.9% in Costa Rica (OR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.41-1.34), and 19.0% in Spain (reference). Incidence of new disabling LBP was higher in Nicaragua, 17.2%(OR=2.49; 95% CI: 1.43-4.34) and Costa Rica, 13.6% (OR=1.89; 95% CI: 1.03-3.48) than Spain (7.7%), while persistence of LBP was higher only in Nicaragua.&#13;
Conclusions—Prevalence of LBP and disabling LBP was higher in Costa Rican and Nicaraguan office workers than in Spain, but incidence was higher mainly in Nicaragua. Measured sociodemographic, job-related and health-related variables only partly explained the differences between countries, and further research is needed to explore reasons for the remaining differences.
Artículo científico
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/2238/9958</guid>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
