Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorVíquez, Luis
dc.contributor.authorBarquero, Vinicio
dc.contributor.authorSoler, Carles
dc.contributor.authorRoldan, Eduardo R. S.
dc.contributor.authorValverde-Abarca, Anthony
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T21:49:23Z
dc.date.available2025-02-10T21:49:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2238/15695
dc.descriptionBiology, vol.9, no.138 (Jun, 2020):2-16es
dc.description.abstractThe ejaculate is heterogenous and sperm sub-populations with different kinematic patterns can be identified in various species. Nevertheless, although these sub-populations are statistically well defined, the statistical differences are not always relevant. The aim of the present study was to characterize kinematic sub-populations in sperm from two bovine species, and diluted with different commercial extenders, and to determine the statistical relevance of sub-populations through Bayesian analysis. Semen from 10 bulls was evaluated after thawing. An ISAS®v1 computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA)-Mot system was employed with an image acquisition rate of 50 Hz and ISAS®D4C20 counting chambers. Sub-populations of motile spermatozoa were characterized using multivariate procedures such as principal components (PCs) analysis and clustering methods (k-means model). Four different sperm sub-populations were identified from three PCs that involved progressiveness, velocity, and cell undulatory movement. The proportions of the different sperm sub-populations varied with the extender used and in the two species. Despite a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between extenders, the Bayesian analysis confirmed that only one of them (Triladyl®) presented relevant differences in kinematic patterns when compared with Tris-EY and OptiXcell®. Extenders differed in the proportion of sperm cells in each of the kinematic sub-populations. Similar patterns were identified in Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Bayesian results indicate that sub-populations SP1, SP2, and SP3 were different for PC criteria and these differences were relevant. For velocity, linearity, and progressiveness, the SP4 did not show a relevant difference regarding the other sperm sub-populations. The classical approach of clustering or sperm subpopulation thus may not have a direct biological meaning. Therefore, the biological relevance of sperm sub-populations needs to be reevaluated.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherBiologyes
dc.rightsacceso abiertoes
dc.subjectToroses
dc.subjectGanado vacunoes
dc.subjectReproducción animales
dc.subjectCinética espermáticaes
dc.subjectEspermatozoides-Motilidades
dc.subjectCasa -- Programa para computadores
dc.titleKinematic sub-populations in bull spermatozoa: a comparison of classical and bayesian approacheses
dc.typeartículo científicoes
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/biology9060138


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem