Kinematic sub-populations in bull spermatozoa: a comparison of classical and bayesian approaches
Loading...
Date
Authors
Víquez, Luis
Barquero, Vinicio
Sole, Carles
Roldan, Eduardo R.S.
Valverde, Anthony
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Biology 2020
Abstract
The ejaculate is heterogenous and sperm sub-populations with different kinematic patterns
can be identified in various species. Nevertheless, although these sub-populations are statistically
well defined, the statistical differences are not always relevant. The aim of the present study was to
characterize kinematic sub-populations in sperm from two bovine species, and diluted with different
commercial extenders, and to determine the statistical relevance of sub-populations through Bayesian
analysis. Semen from 10 bulls was evaluated after thawing. An ISAS®v1 computer-assisted sperm
analysis (CASA)-Mot system was employed with an image acquisition rate of 50 Hz and ISAS®D4C20
counting chambers. Sub-populations of motile spermatozoa were characterized using multivariate
procedures such as principal components (PCs) analysis and clustering methods (k-means model).
Four different sperm sub-populations were identified from three PCs that involved progressiveness,
velocity, and cell undulatory movement. The proportions of the different sperm sub-populations
varied with the extender used and in the two species. Despite a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between
extenders, the Bayesian analysis confirmed that only one of them (Triladyl®) presented relevant
differences in kinematic patterns when compared with Tris-EY and OptiXcell®. Extenders differed in
the proportion of sperm cells in each of the kinematic sub-populations. Similar patterns were identified
in Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Bayesian results indicate that sub-populations SP1, SP2, and SP3 were
different for PC criteria and these differences were relevant. For velocity, linearity, and progressiveness,
the SP4 did not show a relevant difference regarding the other sperm sub-populations. The classical
approach of clustering or sperm subpopulation thus may not have a direct biological meaning.
Therefore, the biological relevance of sperm sub-populations needs to be reevaluated.
Description
Artículo científico
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as acceso abierto
