Tecnológico de Costa Rica
  • ¿Cómo publicar en el Repositorio TEC?
  • Políticas
  • Recursos Educativos
  • Contáctenos
    • español
    • English
  • español 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   Página Principal
  • Grupos de Investigación
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   Página Principal
  • Grupos de Investigación
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo el RepositorioComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosPalabras clavesTipo de Recurso EducativoDestinatarioEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosPalabras clavesTipo de Recurso EducativoDestinatario

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Upper extremity musculoskeletal pain among office workers in three Spanish-speaking countries: findings from the CUPID study

Thumbnail
Ver/
upper_extremity_musculoskeletal_pain_among.pdf (213.0Kb)
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84959273920&doi=10.1136%2foemed-2015-103327&partnerID=40&md5=8b801e2108ff856ee3333f2cee3736c7
Fecha
2016
Autor
Campos-Fumero, Adriana
Delclos, George
Douphrate, David
Felknor, Sarah
Vargas-Prada, Sergio
Serra, Consol
Coggon, David
Ruiz-De Porras, David Gimeno
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Resumen
Objectives To estimate the prevalence and incidence of upper extremity musculoskeletal pain (UEMP) and related disability among office workers in Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Spain. Methods Data from the multinational Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability (CUPID) study on 947 (93%) participants at baseline with 90% follow-up after 12 months were employed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the associations (ORs and corresponding 95% CIs) between country and six outcomes: baseline prevalence of (1) UEMP in past 12 months, (2) UEMP in past month and (3) disabling UEMP in past month; (4) incidence of new UEMP at follow-up; (5) incidence of new disabling UEMP at follow-up and (6) persistence of UEMP at follow-up, after adjustment for sociodemographic, job-related and health-related covariates. Results Baseline prevalence of UEMP in the past month was higher in Costa Rica (53.6%) (OR=1.89; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.62) and Nicaragua (51.9%) (OR=1.74; 95% CI 1.28 to 2.35) than in Spain (38.4%). Compared to Spain (33.2%), the incidence of new UEMP was 50.4% in Costa Rica (OR=2.04; 95% CI 1.34 to 3.12) and 60.2% in Nicaragua (OR=3.04; 95% CI 2.06 to 4.50). The incidence of disabling UEMP was higher in Nicaragua (OR=2.57; 95% CI 1.50 to 4.41) and Costa Rica (OR=2.16; 95% CI 1.22 to 3.84) when compared to Spain. Conclusions Prevalence of UEMP was approximately twofold higher and its incidence twofold to threefold higher in Costa Rica and Nicaragua as compared with Spain. Between-country differences were only partially explained by the covariates analysed. Research is needed to explore other aspects of work and cultural attributes that might explain the residual differences in UEMP.
Descripción
Artículo científico
Fuente
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/2238/9894
DOI
10.1136/oemed-2015-103327
Compartir
       
Métricas
Colecciones
  • Artículos [27]

|Contáctenos

Repositorio Institucional del Tecnológico de Costa Rica

Sistema de Bibliotecas del TEC | SIBITEC

© DERECHOS RESERVADOS. Un sitio soportado por DSpace(v. 6.3)

RT-1

 

 


|Contáctenos

Repositorio Institucional del Tecnológico de Costa Rica

Sistema de Bibliotecas del TEC | SIBITEC

© DERECHOS RESERVADOS. Un sitio soportado por DSpace(v. 6.3)

RT-1