Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCampos-Fumero, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorDelclos, George
dc.contributor.authorDouphrate, David
dc.contributor.authorFelknor, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorVargas-Prada, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorSerra, Consol
dc.contributor.authorCoggon, David
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-De Porras, David Gimeno
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-10T14:35:11Z
dc.date.available2018-08-10T14:35:11Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84959273920&doi=10.1136%2foemed-2015-103327&partnerID=40&md5=8b801e2108ff856ee3333f2cee3736c7es
dc.identifier.citationCampos-Fumero, A., Delclos, G., Douphrate, D., Felknor, S., Vargas-Prada, S., Serra, C., Coggon, D., & Ruiz-De Porras, D. (2016). Upper extremity musculoskeletal pain among office workers in three Spanish-speaking countries: findings from the CUPID study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 73(6), 1-7.es
dc.identifier.issn13510711
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2238/9894
dc.descriptionArtículo científicoes
dc.description.abstractObjectives To estimate the prevalence and incidence of upper extremity musculoskeletal pain (UEMP) and related disability among office workers in Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Spain. Methods Data from the multinational Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability (CUPID) study on 947 (93%) participants at baseline with 90% follow-up after 12 months were employed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the associations (ORs and corresponding 95% CIs) between country and six outcomes: baseline prevalence of (1) UEMP in past 12 months, (2) UEMP in past month and (3) disabling UEMP in past month; (4) incidence of new UEMP at follow-up; (5) incidence of new disabling UEMP at follow-up and (6) persistence of UEMP at follow-up, after adjustment for sociodemographic, job-related and health-related covariates. Results Baseline prevalence of UEMP in the past month was higher in Costa Rica (53.6%) (OR=1.89; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.62) and Nicaragua (51.9%) (OR=1.74; 95% CI 1.28 to 2.35) than in Spain (38.4%). Compared to Spain (33.2%), the incidence of new UEMP was 50.4% in Costa Rica (OR=2.04; 95% CI 1.34 to 3.12) and 60.2% in Nicaragua (OR=3.04; 95% CI 2.06 to 4.50). The incidence of disabling UEMP was higher in Nicaragua (OR=2.57; 95% CI 1.50 to 4.41) and Costa Rica (OR=2.16; 95% CI 1.22 to 3.84) when compared to Spain. Conclusions Prevalence of UEMP was approximately twofold higher and its incidence twofold to threefold higher in Costa Rica and Nicaragua as compared with Spain. Between-country differences were only partially explained by the covariates analysed. Research is needed to explore other aspects of work and cultural attributes that might explain the residual differences in UEMP.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherOccupational and Environmental Medicinees
dc.relation.hasversion10.1136/oemed-2015-103327es
dc.sourceOccupational and Environmental Medicinees
dc.subjectDiscapacidades
dc.subjectSaludes
dc.subjectMúsculoses
dc.subjectRelaciones laboraleses
dc.subjectCondiciones de trabajoes
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::MEDICINE::Social medicine::Public health medicine research areas::Occupational medicinees
dc.titleUpper extremity musculoskeletal pain among office workers in three Spanish-speaking countries: findings from the CUPID studyes
dc.typeartículo originales


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem